State v. Midlam

986 N.E.2d 28, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1411
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 24, 2013
Docket2013-0318
StatusPublished

This text of 986 N.E.2d 28 (State v. Midlam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Midlam, 986 N.E.2d 28, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1411 (Ohio 2013).

Opinion

Greene App. No. 2012 CA 25, 2012-Ohio-5539. On motion for delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Lanzinger and O’Neill, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Midlam
2012 Ohio 5539 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
986 N.E.2d 28, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-midlam-ohio-2013.