State v. Middleton
This text of 232 S.E.2d 342 (State v. Middleton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On October 4, 1976, the Supreme Court of the United States entered an order granting the appellant’s petition for a writ of certiorari and vacated the judgment of this Court affirming the appellant’s conviction. See State v. Middleton, 266 S. C. 251, 222 S. E. (2d) 763 (1976). The Supreme Court of the United States remanded for further consideration in light of Doyle and Wood v. Ohio, 426 U. S. 610, 96 S. Ct. 2240, 49 L. Ed. (2d) 91 (1976).
We conclude that Doyle and Wood v. Ohio, supra, is inapposite to the instant case. Therefore, we reaffirm the conviction and sentence of Middleton.
Reaffirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
232 S.E.2d 342, 268 S.C. 152, 1977 S.C. LEXIS 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-middleton-sc-1977.