State v. Middleton
143 A. 920, 105 N.J.L. 252, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 349
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Yan Buskirk, MoGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Middleton, 143 A. 920, 105 N.J.L. 252, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 349 (N.J. 1928).
143 A. 920 (State v. Middleton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.