State v. Middleton

Supreme Court of Missouri

State v. Middleton

168 S.W. 633, 259 Mo. 449, 1914 Mo. LEXIS 92

Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided June 23, 1914·Published

Opinion

ROY, C.

The defendant was convicted of rape under an indictment against him and Charles Parris and others. There were separate trials after severance. The facts are substantially the same in all these cases. In accordance with the opinion in the Parris case, ante, p. 435, the judgment herein is reversed and the defendant discharged.

Williams, C., concurs.

PER CURIAM. — The foregoing opinion of Roy, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROY, C.

The defendant was convicted of rape under an indictment against him and Charles Parris and others. There were separate trials after severance. The facts are substantially the same in all these cases. In accordance with the opinion in the Parris case, ante, p. 435, the judgment herein is reversed and the defendant discharged.

Williams, C., concurs.

PER CURIAM. — The foregoing opinion of Roy, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court.

All concur.

State v. Middleton, 168 S.W. 633, 259 Mo. 449, 1914 Mo. LEXIS 92 (Mo. 1914).

Pincite

168 S.W. 633 (State v. Middleton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.