State v. Middlebrooks

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Middlebrooks

398 S.W.3d 122, 2013 WL 1901194, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 560

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 7, 2013·No. No. ED 98784·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding her guilty of first-degree assault, in violation of section 565.050 RSMo (2000); and armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a persistent offender and sentenced her to eight years imprisonment on each count, to be served concurrently.

No error of law appears, and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding her guilty of first-degree assault, in violation of section 565.050 RSMo (2000); and armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a persistent offender and sentenced her to eight years imprisonment on each count, to be served concurrently.

No error of law appears, and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Middlebrooks, 398 S.W.3d 122, 2013 WL 1901194, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 560 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

398 S.W.3d 122 (State v. Middlebrooks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.