State v. . Mickle

140 S.E. 150, 194 N.C. 808, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 245
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 23, 1927·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon their appeal to' this Court both defendants rely upon assignments of error based on exceptions to the refusal of the court to allow their motions for judgment as of nonsuit. O. S., 4643. These assignments of error are not sustained. The evidence was properly submitted to the jury and tended to show that each of the defendants operated an automobile on a public highway in this State, wilfully and recklessly, in violation, of 0. S., 2618. There is no error in the judgment that each defendant be confined in the county jail of Forsyth County for thirty days, with capias to issue upon motion of the Solicitor for the State, etc. 0. S., 2599.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . Mickle, 140 S.E. 150, 194 N.C. 808, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 245 (N.C. 1927).

140 S.E. 150 (State v. . Mickle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hill
32 N.W.2d 398 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1948)