State v. . Mickle

140 S.E. 150, 194 N.C. 808, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 245
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 23, 1927
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 140 S.E. 150 (State v. . Mickle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Mickle, 140 S.E. 150, 194 N.C. 808, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 245 (N.C. 1927).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon their appeal to' this Court both defendants rely upon assignments of error based on exceptions to the refusal of the court to allow their motions for judgment as of nonsuit. O. S., 4643. These assignments of error are not sustained. The evidence was properly submitted to the jury and tended to show that each of the defendants operated an automobile on a public highway in this State, wilfully and recklessly, in violation, of 0. S., 2618. There is no error in the judgment that each defendant be confined in the county jail of Forsyth County for thirty days, with capias to issue upon motion of the Solicitor for the State, etc. 0. S., 2599.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hill
32 N.W.2d 398 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 S.E. 150, 194 N.C. 808, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mickle-nc-1927.