State v. Michalcewicz

Utah Supreme Court

State v. Michalcewicz

712 P.2d 253, 1985 Utah LEXIS 990

CourtUtah Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 17, 1985

DocketNo. 19976

StatusPublished

This text of 712 P.2d 253 (State v. Michalcewicz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Michalcewicz, 712 P.2d 253, 1985 Utah LEXIS 990 (Utah 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

HOWE, Justice:

Defendant appeals from a conviction of manslaughter, a second degree felony, in violation of U.C.A., 1953, § 76-5-205(l)(a).

On March 18, 1983, defendant drove his automobile south in one of the northbound lanes of Interstate Highway 15. He collided with an oncoming automobile, seriously injuring the driver and killing a passenger. Investigating officers noticed that defendant’s vehicle contained beer bottles and smelled strongly of alcohol. He was taken to a hospital, where a blood test was performed. The result was that he had a blood alcohol level of .19 by weight, well over the statutorily presumptive level of .08. He was charged with second degree murder, but the jury convicted him of the lesser included offense of manslaughter.

Defendant assails his conviction, contending that the trial court erred in failing to honor his request to give an instruction on vehicular homicide, a class A misdemeanor, under U.C.A., 1953, § 41-6-43.10:

(a) When the death of any person ensues within one year as a proximate result of injury received by the driving of any vehicle in reckless disregard of the safety of others, the person so operating such vehicle shall be guilty of negligent homicide.

As we pointed out in the recent case of State v. Bryan, 11 Utah Adv.Rep. 41 (Nov. 27, 1985), the required mens rea [254]*254for vehicular homicide and for manslaughter are the same, viz., recklessness. In view of that duplication, we held that the defendant’s conviction of manslaughter could not stand, and we reversed the conviction and remanded the case for sentencing in accordance with section 41-6-43.10 (vehicular homicide). That case is controlling here, and the same result must obtain.

Defendant’s conviction of manslaughter is reversed, and this case is remanded to the trial court to sentence defendant under section 41-6-43.10.

HALL, C.J., and STEWART, DURHAM and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HOWE, Justice:

Defendant appeals from a conviction of manslaughter, a second degree felony, in violation of U.C.A., 1953, § 76-5-205(l)(a).

On March 18, 1983, defendant drove his automobile south in one of the northbound lanes of Interstate Highway 15. He collided with an oncoming automobile, seriously injuring the driver and killing a passenger. Investigating officers noticed that defendant’s vehicle contained beer bottles and smelled strongly of alcohol. He was taken to a hospital, where a blood test was performed. The result was that he had a blood alcohol level of .19 by weight, well over the statutorily presumptive level of .08. He was charged with second degree murder, but the jury convicted him of the lesser included offense of manslaughter.

Defendant assails his conviction, contending that the trial court erred in failing to honor his request to give an instruction on vehicular homicide, a class A misdemeanor, under U.C.A., 1953, § 41-6-43.10:

(a) When the death of any person ensues within one year as a proximate result of injury received by the driving of any vehicle in reckless disregard of the safety of others, the person so operating such vehicle shall be guilty of negligent homicide.

As we pointed out in the recent case of State v. Bryan, 11 Utah Adv.Rep. 41 (Nov. 27, 1985), the required mens rea [254]*254for vehicular homicide and for manslaughter are the same, viz., recklessness. In view of that duplication, we held that the defendant’s conviction of manslaughter could not stand, and we reversed the conviction and remanded the case for sentencing in accordance with section 41-6-43.10 (vehicular homicide). That case is controlling here, and the same result must obtain.

Defendant’s conviction of manslaughter is reversed, and this case is remanded to the trial court to sentence defendant under section 41-6-43.10.

HALL, C.J., and STEWART, DURHAM and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

712 P.2d 253, 1985 Utah LEXIS 990, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-michalcewicz-utah-1985.