State v. Michaels

CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 11, 2026
Docket2026-T-0005
StatusPublished

This text of State v. Michaels (State v. Michaels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Michaels, (Ohio Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

[Cite as State v. Michaels, 2026-Ohio-1696.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TRUMBULL COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2026-T-0005

Plaintiff-Appellee, Criminal Appeal from the - vs - Court of Common Pleas

HAROLD MICHAELS, Trial Court No. 2024 CR 00853 Defendant-Appellant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY

Decided: May 11, 2026 Judgment: Appeal dismissed

Dennis Watkins, Trumbull County Prosecutor, Administration Building, Fourth Floor, 160 High Street, N.W., Warren, OH 44481 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).

Aaron M. Meikle, 173 West Market Street, Warren, OH 44481 (For Defendant- Appellant).

SCOTT LYNCH, J.

{¶1} On January 23, 2026, appellant, Harold Michaels, filed a notice of appeal

from the Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas’ January 7, 2026 entry which denied

his motion to withdraw his guilty plea.

{¶2} Upon review of the trial court docket, it appears that a sentencing hearing

was scheduled for November 25, 2025; however, no judgment entry of sentence has been

issued.

{¶3} Pursuant to R.C. 2953.02, in criminal cases, a court of appeals only

possesses jurisdiction to hear an appeal if it is from a “judgment or final order.” Furthermore, the Supreme Court of Ohio has stated that “in a criminal case there must

be a sentence which constitutes a judgment or a final order which amounts ‘to a

disposition of the cause’ before there is a basis for appeal.” State v. Chamberlain, 177

Ohio St. 104, 106-107 (1964); see also State v. Nixon, 2022-Ohio-4467, ¶ 10 (11th Dist.).

{¶4} Here, there has been no disposition of the underlying cause as the court

has not issued an entry of sentence.

{¶5} Because there is no final appealable order, the appeal is premature, and

this court lacks jurisdiction.

{¶6} Accordingly, this appeal is hereby, sua sponte, dismissed for lack of

jurisdiction.

JOHN J. EKLUND, J.,

ROBERT J. PATTON, J.,

concur.

PAGE 2 OF 3

Case No. 2026-T-0005 JUDGMENT ENTRY

For the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of this court, it is ordered that

this appeal is hereby dismissed, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction.

All pending motions are hereby overruled as moot.

Costs shall be taxed against appellant.

JUDGE SCOTT LYNCH

JUDGE JOHN J. EKLUND, concurs

JUDGE ROBERT J. PATTON, concurs

THIS DOCUMENT CONSTITUTES A FINAL JUDGMENT ENTRY

A certified copy of this opinion and judgment entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Ohio Rules of Appellate Procedure.

PAGE 3 OF 3

Case No. 2026-T-0005

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Nixon
2022 Ohio 4467 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Michaels, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-michaels-ohioctapp-2026.