State v. Michael

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Michael

672 N.E.2d 176, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1452, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2366

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 21, 1996

Docket96-2574

StatusPublished

This text of 672 N.E.2d 176 (State v. Michael) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Michael, 672 N.E.2d 176, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1452, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2366 (Ohio 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Columbiana App. No. 91-C-39. On November 18, 1996, appellant filed a notice of appeal of the judgment of the court of appeals entered in case No. 91-C-39 on October 2, 1996. Appellant asserted in his notice of appeal that the case originated in the court of appeals and is an appeal of right.

It is determined by the court that this case did not originate in the court of appeals but is an appeal of the court of appeals’ decision denying appellant’s application for reopening under App.R. 26(B). Whereas S.CtPrac.R. II(1)(A)(2) provides that an appeal from the decision of a court of appeals under App.R. 26(B) in a noncapital case shall be designated a claimed appeal of right and whereas appellant did not file a memorandum in support of jurisdiction as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. II(2)(A)(1),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Columbiana App. No. 91-C-39. On November 18, 1996, appellant filed a notice of appeal of the judgment of the court of appeals entered in case No. 91-C-39 on October 2, 1996. Appellant asserted in his notice of appeal that the case originated in the court of appeals and is an appeal of right.

It is determined by the court that this case did not originate in the court of appeals but is an appeal of the court of appeals’ decision denying appellant’s application for reopening under App.R. 26(B). Whereas S.CtPrac.R. II(1)(A)(2) provides that an appeal from the decision of a court of appeals under App.R. 26(B) in a noncapital case shall be designated a claimed appeal of right and whereas appellant did not file a memorandum in support of jurisdiction as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. II(2)(A)(1),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

672 N.E.2d 176, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1452, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-michael-ohio-1996.