State v. Michael Douglas

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

State v. Michael Douglas

DecidedFebruary 11, 2010

Docket2010-UP-124

StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Michael Douglas (State v. Michael Douglas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Michael Douglas, (S.C. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Michael Rachan Douglas, Appellant.

Appeal From York County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-124
Submitted January 4, 2010 Filed February 11, 2010

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Elizabeth Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Assistant Chief Legal Counsel John Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Michael R. Douglas appeals the revocation of his probation. Specifically, Douglas alleges he was a contributing member of society at the time of his arrest and the probation court abused its discretion by revoking his probation. We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and State v. Lee, 350 S.C. 125, 130, 564 S.E.2d 372, 375 (Ct. App. 2002) (holding that in order for an issue to be preserved for appellate review, it must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial judge).

AFFIRMED.

WILLIAMS, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI