State v. . Meyers

134 S.E. 926, 192 N.C. 813, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 426
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 13, 1926
StatusPublished

This text of 134 S.E. 926 (State v. . Meyers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Meyers, 134 S.E. 926, 192 N.C. 813, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 426 (N.C. 1926).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant was indicted for a breach of the prohibition law and was convicted. This is his second appeal. S. v. Meyers, 190 N. C., 239. The case seems to have been tried in substantial compliance with the previous decision and the law generally applicable, and we find in the record no valid reason for granting another trial.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. . Meyers
129 S.E. 600 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 S.E. 926, 192 N.C. 813, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-meyers-nc-1926.