State v. Meyer
64 Mo. 190
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The defendant was indicted under §1, (Wagn. Stat. 247,) for carrying on the business of a dealer in exchange, etc., without license therefor, and on trial had, he was convicted.
For the reason that the evidence adduced at the trial does not show in what county the alleged offense was committed, the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Meyer, 64 Mo. 190 (Mo. 1876).
64 Mo. 190 (State v. Meyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Kenyon
126 S.W.2d 245 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1939)
State v. Quaite
20 Mo. App. 405 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1886)
State v. McGinniss
74 Mo. 245 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1881)
State v. McGrath
73 Mo. 181 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1880)
State v. Tompkins
71 Mo. 613 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1880)
State v. Miller
71 Mo. 89 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1879)