State v. Metzger

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Metzger

157 S.W.3d 359, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 346, 2005 WL 465851

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 1, 2005

DocketED 84029

StatusPublished

This text of 157 S.W.3d 359 (State v. Metzger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Metzger, 157 S.W.3d 359, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 346, 2005 WL 465851 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Metzger (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence imposed after a jury found him guilty of one count of first-degree involuntary manslaughter, in violation of Section 565.024 1 , and one count of armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015. The trial court sentenced Defendant to consecutive terms of two years’ imprisonment on the involuntary manslaughter conviction and three years’ imprisonment on the armed criminal action conviction.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on ap *360 peal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no jurisprudential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All subsequent statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise noted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Metzger (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence imposed after a jury found him guilty of one count of first-degree involuntary manslaughter, in violation of Section 565.024 1 , and one count of armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015. The trial court sentenced Defendant to consecutive terms of two years’ imprisonment on the involuntary manslaughter conviction and three years’ imprisonment on the armed criminal action conviction.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on ap *360 peal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no jurisprudential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All subsequent statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise noted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 S.W.3d 359, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 346, 2005 WL 465851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-metzger-moctapp-2005.