State v. Merritt
648 A.2d 165, 231 Conn. 926, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 357
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 20, 1994
DocketSC 15045
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 648 A.2d 165 (State v. Merritt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Merritt, 648 A.2d 165, 231 Conn. 926, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 357 (Colo. 1994).
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 36 Conn. App. 76 (AC 12377), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court correctly hold that harmless error occurred when the trial court improperly admitted horizontal gaze nystagmus test results and improperly allowed the jury to hear evidence that if eye jerking occurs prior to a forty-five degree angle a subject is more than likely above the legal limit of 0.10 of one percent for intoxication in a trial under General Statutes § 14-227a (a) (1)?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Merritt
659 A.2d 706 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1995)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
648 A.2d 165, 231 Conn. 926, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-merritt-conn-1994.