State v. Merrill v. McMinn

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Merrill v. McMinn

29 N.C. 346

DecidedAugust 15, 1847

StatusPublished

This text of 29 N.C. 346 (State v. Merrill v. McMinn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Merrill v. McMinn, 29 N.C. 346 (N.C. 1847).

Pincite

Opinion

Daniel, J.

It is very certain that the objection would have been held good, had it not been for. the Act of the General Assembly, at its session of 1844-5, curing defects in the official bonds of certain officers therein named. The circumstance, that the constable’s bond was taken by a Court, composed of only three magistrates, makes no difference since the passage of the aforesaid Act of Assembly. State v. Pool, 5 Ired. 105.

Per Curiam-. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniel, J.

It is very certain that the objection would have been held good, had it not been for. the Act of the General Assembly, at its session of 1844-5, curing defects in the official bonds of certain officers therein named. The circumstance, that the constable’s bond was taken by a Court, composed of only three magistrates, makes no difference since the passage of the aforesaid Act of Assembly. State v. Pool, 5 Ired. 105.

Per Curiam-. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 N.C. 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-merrill-v-mcminn-nc-1847.