State v. Merrick

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

State v. Merrick

35 A. 251, 68 N.H. 601

DecidedJune 5, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 35 A. 251 (State v. Merrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Merrick, 35 A. 251, 68 N.H. 601 (N.H. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Indictment, for the unlawful sale of liquor. An association called the Law and Order League prosecuted the defendant in the police court and before the grand jury at their own expense for the purpose of obtaining one half the fine. The attorney-general, without their consent and for reasons not stated, nol prossed the indictment The prosecutors moved that their taxable costs in the police court and before the grand jury be allowed them, to be paid by the county. It was held that the motion should prevail.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Indictment, for the unlawful sale of liquor. An association called the Law and Order League prosecuted the defendant in the police court and before the grand jury at their own expense for the purpose of obtaining one half the fine. The attorney-general, without their consent and for reasons not stated, nol prossed the indictment The prosecutors moved that their taxable costs in the police court and before the grand jury be allowed them, to be paid by the county. It was held that the motion should prevail.

All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 A. 251, 68 N.H. 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-merrick-nh-1894.