State v. Merlino
535 A.2d 968, 109 N.J. 134, 1988 N.J. LEXIS 2
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, 216 N.J.Super. 579.
For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Merlino, 535 A.2d 968, 109 N.J. 134, 1988 N.J. LEXIS 2 (N.J. 1988).
535 A.2d 968 (State v. Merlino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
DEPT. OF LAW & PUBLIC SAFETY v. Merlino
535 A.2d 968 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1988)