State v. Mercer

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Mercer

476 S.W.3d 318, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1212, 2015 WL 7443752

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 24, 2015·No. No. ED 102445·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jonathan Mercer appeals the judgment entered after a bench trial convicting him of possession of a controlled substance. We find no error has occun-ed.

[319] No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jonathan Mercer appeals the judgment entered after a bench trial convicting him of possession of a controlled substance. We find no error has occun-ed.

[319] No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Mercer, 476 S.W.3d 318, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1212, 2015 WL 7443752 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

476 S.W.3d 318 (State v. Mercer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.