State v. Mercer

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Mercer

476 S.W.3d 318, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1212, 2015 WL 7443752

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 24, 2015

DocketNo. ED 102445

StatusPublished

This text of 476 S.W.3d 318 (State v. Mercer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Mercer, 476 S.W.3d 318, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1212, 2015 WL 7443752 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jonathan Mercer appeals the judgment entered after a bench trial convicting him of possession of a controlled substance. We find no error has occun-ed.

[319]*319No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jonathan Mercer appeals the judgment entered after a bench trial convicting him of possession of a controlled substance. We find no error has occun-ed.

[319]*319No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

476 S.W.3d 318, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1212, 2015 WL 7443752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mercer-moctapp-2015.