State v. Mercedes

754 A.2d 1208, 165 N.J. 131, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 828
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 26, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

The Court having determined that because State v. Brimage, 153 N.J. 1, 706 A.2d 1096 (1998), was decided prior to defendant’s sentencing, the Guidelines adopted pursuant to that decision should apply:

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted, and the matter is summarily remanded to the trial court for resentencing consistent with the Brimage Guidelines. If the court determines not to sentence in accordance with the Guidelines, the record on remand shall include a statement of reasons supporting that determination.

Jurisdiction is not retained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Mercedes, 754 A.2d 1208, 165 N.J. 131, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 828 (N.J. 2000).

754 A.2d 1208 (State v. Mercedes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Fowlkes
778 A.2d 422 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2001)