State v. Mendoza

336 Or. App. 502
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedNovember 27, 2024
DocketA180882
StatusUnpublished

This text of 336 Or. App. 502 (State v. Mendoza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Mendoza, 336 Or. App. 502 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

502 November 27, 2024 No. 864

This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ERON MARQUEZ MENDOZA, Defendant-Appellant. Yamhill County Circuit Court 18CR00726; A180882

Ladd J. Wiles, Judge. Submitted on August 29, 2024. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Emma McDermott, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Tookey, Presiding Judge, Egan, Judge, and Kamins, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Lane, 357 Or 619, 355 P3d 914 (2015).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Lane
355 P.3d 914 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
336 Or. App. 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mendoza-orctapp-2024.