State v. Mendoza

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 35IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

3 Plaintiff-Appellee,

4 v. No. 35,268

5 PETER MENDOZA,

6 Defendant-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF VALENCIA COUNTY 8 James L. Sanchez, District Judge

9 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 10 Santa Fe, NM

11 for Appellee

12 Peter Mendoza 13 Santa Rosa, NM

14 Pro se Appellant

15 MEMORANDUM OPINION

16 BUSTAMANTE, Judge. 1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

2 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed,

3 and the time for doing so has expired.

4 {2} Affirmed.

5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

7 _______________________________________ 8 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

9 WE CONCUR:

10 11 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge

12 13 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge