State v. Mendonca

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Mendonca

52 P.3d 445, 183 Or. App. 526, 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1370

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedAugust 28, 2002

Docket921356M, 921411M; A110457, A110458

StatusPublished

This text of 52 P.3d 445 (State v. Mendonca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Mendonca, 52 P.3d 445, 183 Or. App. 526, 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1370 (Or. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of obstructing governmental administration, ORS 162.235, and failure to display a driver’s license, ORS 807.570. She argues on appeal that the record does not demonstrate that she knowingly and intentionally waived her right to counsel. The state concedes that the record does not demonstrate that defendant knowingly and intentionally waived her right to counsel. We accept the state’s concession. See State v. Mendonca, 134 Or App 290, 894 P2d 1247 (1995).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of obstructing governmental administration, ORS 162.235, and failure to display a driver’s license, ORS 807.570. She argues on appeal that the record does not demonstrate that she knowingly and intentionally waived her right to counsel. The state concedes that the record does not demonstrate that defendant knowingly and intentionally waived her right to counsel. We accept the state’s concession. See State v. Mendonca, 134 Or App 290, 894 P2d 1247 (1995).

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 P.3d 445, 183 Or. App. 526, 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mendonca-orctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack