State v. Mendonca
52 P.3d 445, 183 Or. App. 526, 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1370
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of obstructing governmental administration, ORS 162.235, and failure to display a driver’s license, ORS 807.570. She argues on appeal that the record does not demonstrate that she knowingly and intentionally waived her right to counsel. The state concedes that the record does not demonstrate that defendant knowingly and intentionally waived her right to counsel. We accept the state’s concession. See State v. Mendonca, 134 Or App 290, 894 P2d 1247 (1995).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Mendonca, 52 P.3d 445, 183 Or. App. 526, 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1370 (Or. Ct. App. 2002).
52 P.3d 445 (State v. Mendonca) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Mendonca
894 P.2d 1247 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1995)