State v. Membrino

585 A.2d 1275, 24 Conn. App. 811, 1991 Conn. App. LEXIS 46
Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided February 19, 1991·No. 9230·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant appeals from his conviction after his entry of guilty pleas to three counts of sale of narcotics in violation of General Statutes § 21a-277 (a).

Our review of the record, transcripts and briefs clearly indicates that the canvasses undertaken by the trial courts and their determinations that the guilty pleas of the defendant were intelligently and voluntarily made were fully in accord with Practice Book § 711. See also Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S. Ct. 1709, 23 L. Ed. 2d 264 (1969); Sherbo v. Manson, 21 Conn. 172, 572 A.2d 378, cert. denied, 215 Conn. 808, 809, 576 A.2d 539 (1990).

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Membrino, 585 A.2d 1275, 24 Conn. App. 811, 1991 Conn. App. LEXIS 46 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991).

585 A.2d 1275 (State v. Membrino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Membrino v. Warden, No. Cv 91 1142 S (Jan. 11, 1993)
1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 1030 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1993)
State v. Membrino
588 A.2d 1077 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1991)