State v. Membrino
This text of 585 A.2d 1275 (State v. Membrino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant appeals from his conviction after his entry of guilty pleas to three counts of sale of narcotics in violation of General Statutes § 21a-277 (a).
Our review of the record, transcripts and briefs clearly indicates that the canvasses undertaken by the trial courts and their determinations that the guilty pleas of the defendant were intelligently and voluntarily made were fully in accord with Practice Book § 711. See also Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S. Ct. 1709, 23 L. Ed. 2d 264 (1969); Sherbo v. Manson, 21 Conn. 172, 572 A.2d 378, cert. denied, 215 Conn. 808, 809, 576 A.2d 539 (1990).
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
585 A.2d 1275, 24 Conn. App. 811, 1991 Conn. App. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-membrino-connappct-1991.