State v. Melton

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Melton

383 S.W.3d 478, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1424, 2012 WL 5476824

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Melton. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 169 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 13, 2012·No. No. ED 97361·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kerry Melton appeals the judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict convicting him of stealing and second-degree burglary. We find that the trial court did not plainly err in failing to sua sponte give a self-defense instruction for the charge of stealing. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kerry Melton appeals the judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict convicting him of stealing and second-degree burglary. We find that the trial court did not plainly err in failing to sua sponte give a self-defense instruction for the charge of stealing. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Melton, 383 S.W.3d 478, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1424, 2012 WL 5476824 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

383 S.W.3d 478 (State v. Melton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.