State v. Mejia
This text of 616 P.2d 497 (State v. Mejia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this appeal, defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction for Robbery in the First Degree and Robbery in the Second Degree. There was sufficient evidence. See State v. Krummacher, 269 Or 125, 523 P2d 1009 (1974).
The state does acknowledge, however, that "[i]n light of State v. Perkins, 45 Or App 91, 607 P2d 1202 (1980), decided one day prior to the entry of [231]*231defendant’s judgments of conviction [in the present case], * * * the defendant participated in only one robbery.”
Remanded for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
616 P.2d 497, 48 Or. App. 230, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mejia-orctapp-1980.