State v. Meithof
848 P.2d 151, 119 Or. App. 158, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 535
This text of 848 P.2d 151 (State v. Meithof) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Meithof, 848 P.2d 151, 119 Or. App. 158, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 535 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).
Opinion
Defendant appeals his conviction for burglary in the first degree. ORS 164.225. He contends that the court erred in imposing a sentence under ORS 137.635, rather than under the sentencing guidelines. The state concedes that the court erred. We accept that concession. State v. Haydon, 116 Or App 347, 842 P2d 410 (1992).
Conviction affirmed; sentence vacated; remanded for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Haydon
842 P.2d 410 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
848 P.2d 151, 119 Or. App. 158, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-meithof-orctapp-1993.