State v. Medrano

32 A.3d 965, 303 Conn. 912, 2011 WL 6934435, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 518
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided December 8, 2011·No. SC 18895·Published

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 131 Conn. App. 528 (AC 31271), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the defendant was not deprived of his due process right to a fair trial as a result of prosecutorial improprieties?
“2. Was the defendant deprived of his due process right to a fair trial by the trial court’s ‘defendant’s interest’ charge to the jury?
“3. If the answer to question two is in the negative, should the court overrule the holding in State v. Williams, 220 Conn. 385, 397, 599 A.2d 1053 (1991), as it relates to the ‘defendant’s interest’ charge to the jury?”
[913] Decided December 8, 2011 Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Medrano, 32 A.3d 965, 303 Conn. 912, 2011 WL 6934435, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 518 (Colo. 2011).

32 A.3d 965 (State v. Medrano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Medrano
27 A.3d 52 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2011)
State v. Williams
599 A.2d 1053 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1991)