State v. Medrano
32 A.3d 965, 303 Conn. 912, 2011 WL 6934435, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 518
This text of 32 A.3d 965 (State v. Medrano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Medrano, 32 A.3d 965, 303 Conn. 912, 2011 WL 6934435, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 518 (Colo. 2011).
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 131 Conn. App. 528 (AC 31271), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the defendant was not deprived of his due process right to a fair trial as a result of prosecutorial improprieties?
“2. Was the defendant deprived of his due process right to a fair trial by the trial court’s ‘defendant’s interest’ charge to the jury?
“3. If the answer to question two is in the negative, should the court overrule the holding in State v. Williams, 220 Conn. 385, 397, 599 A.2d 1053 (1991), as it relates to the ‘defendant’s interest’ charge to the jury?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Medrano
27 A.3d 52 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2011)
State v. Williams
599 A.2d 1053 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1991)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
32 A.3d 965, 303 Conn. 912, 2011 WL 6934435, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-medrano-conn-2011.