State v. Medlin
This text of 127 S.E.2d 552 (State v. Medlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence, when considered in the light most favorable to the State, was sufficient to warrant submission to the jury and to support the verdict and judgment. Indeed, this is not challenged by defendant. Defendant assigns as error (1) certain rulings, questions and remarks of the presiding judge during the taking of evidence, and (2) certain portions of the court’s instructions to the jury. Each of defendant’s assignments has received careful consideration. However, none discloses prejudicial error and particular discussion thereof is deemed unnecessary. Hence, defendant’s assignments are overruled.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 S.E.2d 552, 257 N.C. 773, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-medlin-nc-1962.