State v. Medina

New Mexico Court of Appeals·Decided October 29, 2021·Unpublished

Opinion

This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

No. A-1-CA-38944

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

CYNTHIA L. MEDINA a/k/a CYNTHIA LEE FEREBEE,

Defendant-Petitioner.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TAOS COUNTY Emilio J. Chavez, District Judge

Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM M. Victoria Wilson, Assistant Attorney General Albuquerque, NM

for Appellee

Jones, Snead, Wertheim & Clifford, P.A. Jerry Todd Wertheim Santa Fe, NM

for Appellant

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HANISEE, Chief Judge.

{1} Defendant appeals the denial of a motion to dismiss an indictment asserting a violation of the structural integrity of the grand jury process. [Ex.4 1] This Court’s notice of proposed summary disposition proposed to reverse based upon the State’s failure to provide sufficient notice of those grand jury proceedings, as required by Rule 5-302A NMRA. [CN 6] In response, the State has filed a notice that it does not intend to file a memorandum in opposition to this Court’s proposed summary reversal. We, therefore, reverse the district court’s order denying dismissal of the indictment.

{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.

J. MILES HANISEE, Chief Judge

WE CONCUR:

JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge

JACQUELINE R. MEDINA, Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Medina, (N.M. Ct. App. 2021).

State v. Medina (State v. Medina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.