State v. Medina-Laureano

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Medina-Laureano

485 S.W.3d 826, 2016 WL 1469979, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 341

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 12, 2016

DocketNo. ED 102914

StatusPublished

This text of 485 S.W.3d 826 (State v. Medina-Laureano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Medina-Laureano, 485 S.W.3d 826, 2016 WL 1469979, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 341 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gaudencio Medina-Laureano appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of second-degree assault and sentencing him to a year in prison. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not [827]*827clearly abuse its broad discretion in excluding certain testimony. State v. Chaney, 967 S.W.2d 47, 55 (Mo.banc 1998). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

i

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gaudencio Medina-Laureano appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of second-degree assault and sentencing him to a year in prison. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not [827]*827clearly abuse its broad discretion in excluding certain testimony. State v. Chaney, 967 S.W.2d 47, 55 (Mo.banc 1998). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

i

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

485 S.W.3d 826, 2016 WL 1469979, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-medina-laureano-moctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack