State v. Medel

342 Or. App. 623
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedAugust 13, 2025
DocketA183957
StatusUnpublished

This text of 342 Or. App. 623 (State v. Medel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Medel, 342 Or. App. 623 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

No. 735 August 13, 2025 623

This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ADRIAN RAYMOND MEDEL, Defendant-Appellant. Washington County Circuit Court 20CR23704; A183957

Brandon M. Thompson, Judge. Submitted July 9, 2025. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Brett J. Allin, Deputy Public Defender, Oregon Public Defense Commission, filed the brief for appellant. Dan Rayfield, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, Joyce, Judge, and Hellman, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Lane, 357 Or 619, 355 P3d 914 (2015); State v Logston, 374 Or 101 (2025).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Lane
355 P.3d 914 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2015)
State v. Logston
374 Or. 101 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
342 Or. App. 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-medel-orctapp-2025.