State v. Meaux
This text of 108 La. 118 (State v. Meaux) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[119]*119The opinion of the court was delivered by
The accused was prosecuted for shooting with intent to kill, convicted and sentenced to three years at hard labor.
He appeals.
The only bill of exceptions found in the record recites that on the trial of the case a witness was called to the stand to prove that the shooting in question was accidental; that he was asked to state whether or not the shooting was accidental; that the district attorney objected to the question; and that the trial judge, in sustaining the obejction, said: — Unless the defendant can show that he had a right to have his pistol with him on the date charged in the indictment, no evidence will be allowed to prove that the shooting was accidental.
To this, the trial judge, in the "per curiam" part of the bill, says he made no such ruling as that set forth.
Ho note of the testimony and ruling made at the time was annexed to the bill.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
108 La. 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-meaux-la-1902.