State v. Meadows

585 N.E.2d 830, 63 Ohio St. 3d 135, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 238
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 4, 1992·No. No. 91-1080·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

The cause is affirmed on the authority of State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60, 584 N.E.2d 1204. However, defendant-appellant may file for delayed reconsideration of his ineffectiveness-of-counsel claim in the Hamilton County Court of Appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Holmes, Douglas and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Meadows, 585 N.E.2d 830, 63 Ohio St. 3d 135, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 238 (Ohio 1992).

585 N.E.2d 830 (State v. Meadows) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. McGlone
615 N.E.2d 1139 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1992)