State v. Meadows

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Meadows

196 A.3d 327, 330 Conn. 947

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedNovember 20, 2018

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 196 A.3d 327 (State v. Meadows) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Meadows, 196 A.3d 327, 330 Conn. 947 (Colo. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 185 Conn.App. 287, ___ A.3d ___ (2018), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that (1) the defendant's constitutional right to be free from double jeopardy was not violated when he was convicted of two counts of violation of a standing criminal protective order on the basis of different words spoken to the protected person during a single, brief, and uninterrupted statement, and (2) the jury was properly instructed that to `harass' means to `trouble, worry or torment' for purposes of an enhanced penalty for violating a standing criminal protective order?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 185 Conn.App. 287, ___ A.3d ___ (2018), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that (1) the defendant's constitutional right to be free from double jeopardy was not violated when he was convicted of two counts of violation of a standing criminal protective order on the basis of different words spoken to the protected person during a single, brief, and uninterrupted statement, and (2) the jury was properly instructed that to `harass' means to `trouble, worry or torment' for purposes of an enhanced penalty for violating a standing criminal protective order?"

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 A.3d 327, 330 Conn. 947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-meadows-conn-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack