State v. Meacham
67 Vt. 707
Opinion
In this case the views of the judges who heard it were such that no decision could be made in regard to the sufficiency of the information. But, inasmuch as the information of the state’s attorney can be amended, by his successor in office, even, both in form and in substance, the court pro forma reversed the judgment of the county court and remanded the case to be there proceeded with.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Meacham, 67 Vt. 707 (Vt. 1895).
67 Vt. 707 (State v. Meacham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Harre
195 A. 244 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1937)
State v. Ryea
122 A. 422 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1923)
State v. Barrell
54 A. 183 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1903)