State v. McSwain

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. McSwain

189 S.E.2d 741, 15 N.C. App. 293, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1907

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedJuly 12, 1972

DocketNo. 7215SC521

StatusPublished

This text of 189 S.E.2d 741 (State v. McSwain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. McSwain, 189 S.E.2d 741, 15 N.C. App. 293, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1907 (N.C. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PARKER, Judge.

There was ample evidence to support the verdict. On conflicting evidence, the jury believed the testimony of the State’s witnesses rather than the testimony of defendant and his witnesses. It was the jury’s province to resolve the conflict. We have carefully reviewed the entire record and in defendant’s trial and the judgment appealed from find

No error.

Judges Vaughn and Graham concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PARKER, Judge.

There was ample evidence to support the verdict. On conflicting evidence, the jury believed the testimony of the State’s witnesses rather than the testimony of defendant and his witnesses. It was the jury’s province to resolve the conflict. We have carefully reviewed the entire record and in defendant’s trial and the judgment appealed from find

No error.

Judges Vaughn and Graham concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 S.E.2d 741, 15 N.C. App. 293, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcswain-ncctapp-1972.