State v. McRoyal

687 So. 2d 371, 1997 La. LEXIS 465, 1997 WL 58859
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedFebruary 7, 1997
DocketNo. 96-KK-3051
StatusPublished

This text of 687 So. 2d 371 (State v. McRoyal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. McRoyal, 687 So. 2d 371, 1997 La. LEXIS 465, 1997 WL 58859 (La. 1997).

Opinion

CALOGERO, Chief Justice,

would grant for the following reasons.

The district court deviated from the mandatory sentence of life imprisonment under La.R.S. 15:529.1, for the stated reason that a sentence of life imprisonment for this purse-snatching (albeit a third offense)1 was constitutionally excessive. Contrary to the majority, I believe that the trial judge acted within the parameters of his discretion to review sentences for excess, under State v. Dorthey, 628 So.2d 1276 (La.1993) and State v. Sepulvado, 367 So.2d 762 (La.1979). Accordingly, I would grant defendant’s writ application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crefasi v. Crefasi
628 So. 2d 1274 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1993)
State v. Sepulvado
367 So. 2d 762 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
687 So. 2d 371, 1997 La. LEXIS 465, 1997 WL 58859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcroyal-la-1997.