State v. McRee

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. McRee

917 A.2d 781, 189 N.J. 637, 2007 N.J. LEXIS 218

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 8, 2007·Published

Opinion

This application having been previously considered and granted by the Court, and the Court having reconsidered the matter as part of defendant’s petition for certification,

[638] And the Court having determined that its grant of defendant’s motion was improvident,

And good cause appearing;

IT IS ORDERED that the October 5, 2006, Order granting defendant’s pro se motion to expand the record is vacated, without prejudice to a renewal of the application as part of an appropriate petition for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 3:22. See also, the Court’s Order denying certification in C-563-06.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This application having been previously considered and granted by the Court, and the Court having reconsidered the matter as part of defendant’s petition for certification,

[638] And the Court having determined that its grant of defendant’s motion was improvident,

And good cause appearing;

IT IS ORDERED that the October 5, 2006, Order granting defendant’s pro se motion to expand the record is vacated, without prejudice to a renewal of the application as part of an appropriate petition for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 3:22. See also, the Court’s Order denying certification in C-563-06.

State v. McRee, 917 A.2d 781, 189 N.J. 637, 2007 N.J. LEXIS 218 (N.J. 2007).

Pincite

917 A.2d 781 (State v. McRee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.