State v. McPherson
444 P.2d 5, 250 Or. 601, 1968 Ore. LEXIS 605
Opinion
In this appeal we are asked to re-examine our decision in State v. Carlton, 1963, 233 Or 296, 378 P2d [602]*602557, in respect to a thief being charged with receiving and concealing stolen property. We decline to do so. In this case the indictment was charged in the conjunctive. “Proof of any one of the acts charged was sufficient to make out the offense.” State v. Soasey, 1964, 237 Or 167, 171, 390 P2d 190, 192. There was such proof in the case.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. McPherson, 444 P.2d 5, 250 Or. 601, 1968 Ore. LEXIS 605 (Or. 1968).
444 P.2d 5 (State v. McPherson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pote v. State
695 P.2d 617 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1985)