State v. McPherson

Oregon Supreme Court

State v. McPherson

444 P.2d 5, 250 Or. 601, 1968 Ore. LEXIS 605

CourtOregon Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 24, 1968

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 444 P.2d 5 (State v. McPherson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. McPherson, 444 P.2d 5, 250 Or. 601, 1968 Ore. LEXIS 605 (Or. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal we are asked to re-examine our decision in State v. Carlton, 1963, 233 Or 296, 378 P2d [602]*602557, in respect to a thief being charged with receiving and concealing stolen property. We decline to do so. In this case the indictment was charged in the conjunctive. “Proof of any one of the acts charged was sufficient to make out the offense.” State v. Soasey, 1964, 237 Or 167, 171, 390 P2d 190, 192. There was such proof in the case.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal we are asked to re-examine our decision in State v. Carlton, 1963, 233 Or 296, 378 P2d [602]*602557, in respect to a thief being charged with receiving and concealing stolen property. We decline to do so. In this case the indictment was charged in the conjunctive. “Proof of any one of the acts charged was sufficient to make out the offense.” State v. Soasey, 1964, 237 Or 167, 171, 390 P2d 190, 192. There was such proof in the case.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

444 P.2d 5, 250 Or. 601, 1968 Ore. LEXIS 605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcpherson-or-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack