State v. McPhearson

169 S.W.3d 548, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1217, 2005 WL 1945484
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 16, 2005·No. ED 84718·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Jean McPhearson, appeals the judgment entered upon his convictions by a jury for possession of a controlled substance (marijuana), Section 195.202, RSMo.2000, 1 possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to use, section 195.233, and driving with a revoked license, section 302.321. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no error. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo.2000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. McPhearson, 169 S.W.3d 548, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1217, 2005 WL 1945484 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

169 S.W.3d 548 (State v. McPhearson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richardson v. Director of Revenue, State
169 S.W.3d 548 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)