State v. McNulty

948 S.W.2d 725, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1369, 1900 WL 5532
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 29, 1997·No. No. 70868·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered upon his conviction by a jury of one count of murder in the second degree, Section 565.021, RSMo 1994, and one count of armed criminal action, Section 571.015, RSMo 1994. Defendant was sentenced as a prior offender to twenty years’ imprisonment for second-degree murder with a consecutive five-year term for armed criminal action.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. McNulty, 948 S.W.2d 725, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1369, 1900 WL 5532 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

948 S.W.2d 725 (State v. McNulty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McNulty v. State
2 S.W.3d 851 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1999)