State v. McNeil
273 S.E.2d 306, 301 N.C. 102, 1980 N.C. LEXIS 1318
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Clarence David McNEIL.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Archie W. Anders, Raleigh, for the State.
*307 Loflin, Loflin & Acker, Durham, for defendant.
Defendant's notice of appeal and petition for discretionary review under G.S. § 731, 47 N.CApp. 30, 266 S.E.2d 824. Motion of the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question. Motion allowed; petition denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. McNeil, 273 S.E.2d 306, 301 N.C. 102, 1980 N.C. LEXIS 1318 (N.C. 1980).
273 S.E.2d 306 (State v. McNeil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. McNeil
266 S.E.2d 824 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)