State v. McNeely

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. McNeely

516 S.W.3d 385, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 191, 2017 WL 1056211

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 21, 2017

DocketNo. ED 104015

StatusPublished

This text of 516 S.W.3d 385 (State v. McNeely) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. McNeely, 516 S.W.3d 385, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 191, 2017 WL 1056211 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

John McNeely appeals the trial court’s judgment after a jury convicted him of two counts of first-degree child molestation. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

John McNeely appeals the trial court’s judgment after a jury convicted him of two counts of first-degree child molestation. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

516 S.W.3d 385, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 191, 2017 WL 1056211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcneely-moctapp-2017.