State v. McNabb

478 P.3d 769
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedJanuary 8, 2021
Docket120390
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 478 P.3d 769 (State v. McNabb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. McNabb, 478 P.3d 769 (kan 2021).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

No. 120,390

STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee,

v.

DAVID PATRICK MCNABB, Appellant.

SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

First-degree premeditated murder is an off-grid person felony subject to a presumptive hard 50 sentence. Under K.S.A. 2019 Supp. 21-6620(c)(1)(A), however, a district court may depart from this presumptive sentence if "the sentencing judge finds substantial and compelling reasons, following a review of mitigating circumstances, to impose" a hard 25 sentence.

Appeal from Linn District Court; MARK ALAN WARD, judge. Opinion filed January 8, 2021. Affirmed.

Michelle A. Davis, of Kansas Appellate Defender Office, was on the brief for appellant.

Jodi Litfin, assistant solicitor general, and Derek Schmidt, attorney general, were on the brief for appellee.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

STEGALL, J.: David Patrick McNabb pled no contest to two counts of first-degree premeditated murder, felony theft, and interference with law enforcement after admitting he killed his grandmother Betty McNabb and uncle Kenneth McNabb. Before sentencing,

1 McNabb moved for a downward durational departure from the presumptive hard 50 sentence for the two murders. The court rejected McNabb's motion and sentenced McNabb to serve two consecutive hard 50 sentences. McNabb appeals the district court's denial of his motion for a downward durational departure.

Before the court accepted McNabb's plea, the State summarized its evidence against McNabb. On November 12, 2016, members of the McNabb family reported Betty and Kenneth missing to the Linn County Sheriff's Office. Family members could not locate Betty and Kenneth inside their home and confirmed with neighbor Robert Thayer that he had not seen Betty or Kenneth for about three days. Law enforcement reported to Betty and Kenneth's residence and examined the home, finding blood throughout, including a large saturation stain. That blood was later found to be the blood of Betty McNabb.

While at Betty and Kenneth's home, law enforcement officers learned that McNabb contacted Steve Melton the day before Betty and Kenneth were reported missing. McNabb showed up at Melton's house on November 11, 2016, asking for Melton to help him move a vehicle. McNabb brought a white SUV to Melton's residence and told Melton he needed to get rid of it. After receiving the information about McNabb's interaction with Melton, law enforcement visited Melton's property and discovered a white SUV registered to Kenneth McNabb.

Law enforcement then located and interviewed McNabb. McNabb told investigators that he had argued with Betty and Kenneth. And during that altercation, McNabb shot both Betty and Kenneth with a .22 caliber revolver. McNabb then told investigators that he placed the bodies of Betty and Kenneth into two 55-gallon barrels and loaded them into his Ford F-150 pickup truck. McNabb then drove the barrels to a

2 bridge and threw them into a river along with the revolver. Law enforcement searched nearby bridges and rivers based on this information, but they were unable to locate the barrels allegedly containing the bodies of Betty and Kenneth.

Law enforcement executed a search warrant at McNabb's residence the day after he confessed to killing Betty and Kenneth. McNabb lived with his parents and his father told investigators he kept three guns in the residence—including two .22 caliber revolvers. Officers found one of the .22 caliber High Standard revolvers in the master bathroom of the home. This gun appeared "clean" unlike the other two guns that were dirty and covered in cobwebs. Later testing revealed McNabb's fingerprints on the .22 found in the master bathroom.

After McNabb was arrested, Kendra Renn contacted law enforcement and told them she witnessed McNabb's Ford F-150 truck pull onto her property on November 10, 2016. McNabb's truck pulled into the back of the property in a brush burn area. Renn did not know why McNabb was on her property, but she figured McNabb and Renn's husband were working on a project together.

With this information, law enforcement officers found a burial site on the back side of Renn's property concealed by a tree line. Law enforcement excavated the bodies of Betty and Kenneth McNabb from this burial site. Betty's body was nude and had nylon rope around her lower torso and feet. Kenneth's body was dressed in overalls. Kenneth's right foot was severed and found in a brown boot in the burial site. His left foot was still attached to his body but almost completely severed.

Dr. Altaf Hossain at Frontier Forensics performed autopsies on Betty and Kenneth. Dr. Hossain determined that Betty died from blunt force trauma to her head. Betty suffered a fractured skull on the right side of her head, consistent with being hit by a non-edged blunt instrument. Dr. Hossain found no evidence of Betty being shot.

3 Dr. Hossain found three gunshot wounds in Kenneth's body—one in his upper chest with a front to back trajectory, one in the interior lower neck with a front to back trajectory, and one in the right lateral lower neck with a front to back and downwards right to left trajectory. Dr. Hossain determined that all the projectiles recovered from Kenneth's body appeared to be the size of a .22 caliber projectile. A firearm examination also determined that a bullet fragment removed from Kenneth's body was consistent with being shot from the revolver found in the master bathroom.

The court accepted McNabb's no contest plea to two counts of first-degree premeditated murder, theft, and interference with law enforcement based on these facts. Before sentencing, McNabb moved for a downward durational departure requesting that the court impose hard 25 sentences for each count of premeditated murder instead of the presumptive hard 50 sentences. McNabb's motion listed numerous mitigating factors including: McNabb did not have any prior felony convictions; if the crime had been committed before 2013 it would not have been off-grid; if the crime was committed five years ago, the maximum sentence would be two combined sentences of hard 25 years; the departure sentence was not disproportionate to the severity level of the crime when weighed against mitigating factors; his age at the time of the crime; he had nothing to gain from the incident; the victims' family favored a nonprison sentence; character evidence showed he was not a danger to the public; he was well behaved while incarcerated; he had supportive family and friends in the immediate area; he was receptive to rehabilitation; he accepted responsibility for his actions and was extremely remorseful; and he wanted to move on with his life as a law abiding citizen.

The court rejected McNabb's motion finding the evidence produced did not rise to substantial and compelling circumstances for the court to depart from the presumptive

4 sentence. The court ordered McNabb to serve two hard 50 sentences consecutively for the two murders. McNabb appeals the district court's denial of his motion for a downward durational departure.

ANALYSIS

McNabb argues the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion because McNabb presented mitigating evidence showing he was a qualified candidate for parole at the earliest release date. We review a district court's decision not to depart from a presumptive sentence for abuse of discretion. State v. Galloway, 311 Kan. 238, 252, 459 P.3d 195 (2020).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Lopez
Supreme Court of Kansas, 2026
State v. Macormac
Supreme Court of Kansas, 2025
State v. Wohlgemuth
Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2025
State v. Mitchell
Supreme Court of Kansas, 2025
State v. Rojo
Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2025
State v. Fowler
508 P.3d 347 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
478 P.3d 769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcnabb-kan-2021.