State v. McMurray

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. McMurray

572 S.W.3d 166

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 30, 2019

DocketWD 81442

StatusPublished

This text of 572 S.W.3d 166 (State v. McMurray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. McMurray, 572 S.W.3d 166 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Samuel McMurray appeals his convictions of first-degree child molestation and second-degree child molestation following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, arguing the trial court abused its discretion by limiting his cross-examination of a State's expert witness. Finding no error, we affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided a memorandum of law to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Samuel McMurray appeals his convictions of first-degree child molestation and second-degree child molestation following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, arguing the trial court abused its discretion by limiting his cross-examination of a State's expert witness. Finding no error, we affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided a memorandum of law to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

572 S.W.3d 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcmurray-moctapp-2019.