State v. McMurphy

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. McMurphy

139 P.3d 975, 207 Or. App. 45, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1029

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJuly 19, 2006

Docket0401-40263; A125619

StatusPublished

This text of 139 P.3d 975 (State v. McMurphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. McMurphy, 139 P.3d 975, 207 Or. App. 45, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1029 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for carrying a concealed weapon. ORS 166.240. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence of the weapon. Defendant argues that the evidence was obtained by means of exploitation of an unlawful police stop. The state concedes that, under State v. Hall, 339 Or 7, 115 P3d 908 (2005), the trial court erred. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for carrying a concealed weapon. ORS 166.240. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence of the weapon. Defendant argues that the evidence was obtained by means of exploitation of an unlawful police stop. The state concedes that, under State v. Hall, 339 Or 7, 115 P3d 908 (2005), the trial court erred. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 P.3d 975, 207 Or. App. 45, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1029, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcmurphy-orctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack