State v. McMurphy
139 P.3d 975, 207 Or. App. 45, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1029
Opinion
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for carrying a concealed weapon. ORS 166.240. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence of the weapon. Defendant argues that the evidence was obtained by means of exploitation of an unlawful police stop. The state concedes that, under State v. Hall, 339 Or 7, 115 P3d 908 (2005), the trial court erred. We agree and accept the state’s concession.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. McMurphy, 139 P.3d 975, 207 Or. App. 45, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1029 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).
139 P.3d 975 (State v. McMurphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Hall
115 P.3d 908 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2005)