State v. McMullin

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. McMullin

909 S.W.2d 766, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1929, 1995 WL 686658

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 21, 1995·No. No. WD 50301·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Defendant Inez Genevive McMullin appeals her conviction of four counts of forgery. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error. Because a published opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order under Rule 30.25(b). In addition, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth our reasoning.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Defendant Inez Genevive McMullin appeals her conviction of four counts of forgery. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error. Because a published opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order under Rule 30.25(b). In addition, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth our reasoning.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. McMullin, 909 S.W.2d 766, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1929, 1995 WL 686658 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

909 S.W.2d 766 (State v. McMullin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.