State v. McMickle

Texas Supreme Court

State v. McMickle

34 Tex. 676

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1871

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 34 Tex. 676 (State v. McMickle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. McMickle, 34 Tex. 676 (Tex. 1871).

Pincite

Opinion

Osdebt, J.

Thejudgment of the district court in. this case must be reversed, on the authority of The State, p£ Texas v. Sam. Elliot, decided at this term of the court. The time when -the assault was alleged to have been committed was set forth in the indictment with sufficient definiteness to have put the defendant upon his trial, and the court erred in sustaining the exceptions to» the indictment. The other ground of exception to the indictment is. also untenable, and. should have been overruled. The judgment is. reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Osdebt, J.

Thejudgment of the district court in. this case must be reversed, on the authority of The State, p£ Texas v. Sam. Elliot, decided at this term of the court. The time when -the assault was alleged to have been committed was set forth in the indictment with sufficient definiteness to have put the defendant upon his trial, and the court erred in sustaining the exceptions to» the indictment. The other ground of exception to the indictment is. also untenable, and. should have been overruled. The judgment is. reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 Tex. 676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcmickle-tex-1871.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack