State v. McManus
616 P.2d 1218, 48 Or. App. 403, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3852
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedSeptember 29, 1980
DocketNo. T-79-7524, CA 18089
StatusPublished
This text of 616 P.2d 1218 (State v. McManus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. McManus, 616 P.2d 1218, 48 Or. App. 403, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3852 (Or. Ct. App. 1980).
Opinion
In this driving under the influence case, the trial judge suppressed all evidence and statements arising out of the defendant’s traffic stop because he believed that the arresting officer lacked authority to make the stop. A recitation of the facts demonstrating the judge’s error would benefit neither bench nor bar.
Reversed and remanded for trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
616 P.2d 1218, 48 Or. App. 403, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcmanus-orctapp-1980.