State v. McLeod

Supreme Court of South Carolina

State v. McLeod

293 S.E.2d 699, 278 S.C. 112, 1982 S.C. LEXIS 376

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedJune 10, 1982

Docket21729

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 293 S.E.2d 699 (State v. McLeod) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. McLeod, 293 S.E.2d 699, 278 S.C. 112, 1982 S.C. LEXIS 376 (S.C. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Appellant was convicted of receiving stolen goods, conspiracy, and accessory after the fact of a felony. Appellant’s codefendant was convicted of conspiracy and accessory after the fact of a felony.

The evidence at trial was sufficient to show that the code-fendants conspired to deal in stolen goods and that appellant received goods which he knew were stolen. No error of law affects appellant’s convictions for conspiracy and receiving stolen goods. We affirm the lower court’s judgment on these charges.

With respect to the conviction as an accessory, appellant did not deal with the principal felons; therefore, we reverse his conviction as an accessory on the same ground on which we reversed his codefendant’s conviction. State v. Hodge, 292 S. E. (2d) 600 (S. C. 1982).

[113]*113We reverse appellant’s conviction as an accessory after the fact of a felony; otherwise, the judgment below is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI